Who We Help · Tenant Admin & Security IT Lead
Agentic AI for Tenant Admins & Security IT Leads — Least-Privilege Connectors, Injection Defense, Residency-Correct Agents
You're the person answering 'would you allow this in our tenant?' when a new AI connector shows up. We give you an effective-access audit, a connector registry, a scope-minimization pass, an injection + exfiltration test suite, and residency monitoring — so that answer becomes defensible, not defensive.
Where the friction lives
- ›New AI connectors amplifying existing SharePoint / OneDrive oversharing overnight
- ›OAuth scopes granted broadly at rollout and never trimmed
- ›'Assumed access' ≠ 'effective access' — no one has the real picture
- ›Prompt injection via user-supplied content is a live threat
- ›Silent vendor changes (flex routing, subprocessors) breaking residency posture
High-ROI use cases
Effective-access audit
Real access surfaced across users, groups, sharing links, and guest access — before enabling an agent connector.
Oversharing findings identified + remediated
Scope minimization pass
Every sanctioned connector reduced to minimum required scopes with a named data-boundary owner.
40–70% OAuth scope reduction
Injection + exfiltration test suite
AgentDojo-style adversarial tasks against staging with pass/fail thresholds owned by security.
Baseline ASR + trending down
Residency monitoring
Weekly monitoring of Microsoft / Google / SaaS tenant defaults + provider status pages with named-owner alerts on change.
100% connectors with verified residency map
How we help
Effective-access first
We audit real access, not org-chart access, before touching a single connector setting.
Reusable test harness
You keep the injection + exfiltration suite and run it against every future agent.
Residency-aware design
Where flex routing or subprocessor drift is a risk, we design around it — not after an audit finding.
Continuous, not one-shot
The registry, tests, and monitoring keep running after we leave.
Speaks security's language
Findings map to your existing risk register + change control, not a parallel process.
Engagement model & pricing
8–14 weeks per platform / connector family. Weeks 1–3: effective-access audit + registry. Weeks 4–8: scope-minimization + provenance tagging + injection sanitization. Weeks 9–12: test harness + residency monitoring. Weeks 13–14: handoff + on-call rehearsal. Continuous-monitoring retainer optional.
What you get
- Defensible answer to 'would you allow this in our tenant?'
- Reusable injection + exfiltration test suite you own after handoff
- Effective-access baseline you can trend against
- Residency posture surfaced before the compliance finding
- Aligned to NIST, ISO/IEC 42001, OWASP Agentic Top 10, and MITRE ATLAS
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to replace our DLP program?+
No. This complements DLP by focusing specifically on the AI-connector surface most DLP programs don't yet cover.
Can we do this before rolling out Claude for M365 or a Copilot connector?+
Yes — that's the ideal sequencing. The review answers 'allow?' before enablement, not after.
How is prompt injection actually tested?+
We adapt public benchmarks (AgentDojo-style) to your tools and connectors with pass/fail thresholds your team owns.
What about multimodal / visual injection?+
Included. Images and documents get sanitized + provenance-tagged before reaching the model; visual-injection tests are in the suite.
How often does the review re-run?+
Registry + monitoring is continuous; deep effective-access audit is quarterly for high-risk tenants, semi-annual otherwise.