Historical milestone · 1983
GOMS and the Model Human Processor
Reviewed through September 18, 2026
1983 · Historical milestone
GOMS and the Model Human Processor
- Era
- 1980s
- Theme
- Human–AI interaction & adoption
- Evidence form
- Decomposed skilled interaction into goals, operators, methods, and selection rules and predicted task time
- School / paradigm
- Cognitive engineering
- Institution / context
- Xerox PARC / Carnegie Mellon
- Researchers
- Stuart Card; Thomas Moran; Allen Newell
School of thought
Symbolic AI / GOFAI
Matched on representative researcher.
Intelligence arises from manipulating explicit symbols according to rules, search, and formal representations.
Critique. Knowledge acquisition and combinatorial explosion; brittle under ambiguity, perception noise, and open worlds.
Modern descendants. Tool schemas, planning languages, knowledge graphs, verifiers, program synthesis, and neuro-symbolic systems.
Understand
Plain-language record, transferred from the reviewed source module.
Theory or experimental setup. Made interface performance quantitatively analyzable and tied design to a cognitive architecture.
Result / historical claim. Works best for routine, error-free expert behavior; discovery, collaboration, and emotion are harder to model.
Apply
Professional implication, only where the reviewed record states one.
The checked-in record does not state a separate professional application for this entry. The topic page places it in the wider research lineage: Human–AI interaction and adoption.
Verify
Evidence status, stated limitations, and the external sources this record actually carries.
Evidence form. Decomposed skilled interaction into goals, operators, methods, and selection rules and predicted task time
Limitation / debate. Human-agent workflow analysis, latency budgets, UI evaluation, and task decomposition.
Source status. The source link below is the verified link our reviewed topic research already carries for this milestone.
Reproduce
A reproduction tutorial is linked only when one exists for this exact record.
A reproduction tutorial is not yet available for this entry. The closest reviewed material is Human–AI interaction and adoption.
Cite or share
APA-like: This historical record carries a year only, and no author or publisher of record in the checked-in data. An APA reference would have to invent that metadata.
BibTeX: BibTeX requires an author and publication venue. Historical lineage entries store a narrative record and its source link, not structured authorship, so the field would be fabricated.
Related
Appears in Reasoning enters real-time multimodal interaction.