Historical milestone · 2019
Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction
Reviewed through September 18, 2026
2019 · Historical milestone
Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction
- Era
- 2010s
- Theme
- Human–AI interaction & adoption
- Evidence form
- Guideline synthesis + validation
- School / paradigm
- Human-computer interaction
- Institution / context
- Microsoft Research
- Researchers
- Saleema Amershi; collaborators
Understand
Plain-language record, transferred from the reviewed source module.
Theory or experimental setup. Developed and tested interaction guidelines covering initial use, normal interaction, failure, correction, and adaptation.
Result / historical claim. Translated human-factors principles into a practical design framework for AI product teams.
Apply
Professional implication, only where the reviewed record states one.
The checked-in record does not state a separate professional application for this entry. The topic page places it in the wider research lineage: Human–AI interaction and adoption.
Verify
Evidence status, stated limitations, and the external sources this record actually carries.
Evidence form. Guideline synthesis + validation
Limitation / debate. Heuristics do not provide causal guarantees across every domain, population, or consequence level.
Source status. The source link below is the verified link our reviewed topic research already carries for this milestone.
Reproduce
A reproduction tutorial is linked only when one exists for this exact record.
A reproduction tutorial is not yet available for this entry. The closest reviewed material is Human–AI interaction and adoption.
Cite or share
APA-like: This historical record carries a year only, and no author or publisher of record in the checked-in data. An APA reference would have to invent that metadata.
BibTeX: BibTeX requires an author and publication venue. Historical lineage entries store a narrative record and its source link, not structured authorship, so the field would be fabricated.